|
Poster:
|
cashel |
Date:
|
April 25, 2004 07:04:26am |
|
Forum:
|
prelinger
|
Subject:
|
Re: 3 rules for decency to enhance the archive,s prestige |
Yes, I agree to a peaceful truce. I eagerly await your next film
|
Poster:
|
summerseve |
Date:
|
April 25, 2004 08:19:42am |
|
Forum:
|
prelinger
|
Subject:
|
Re: 3 rules for decency to enhance the archive,s prestige |
A truce it is then. Peace be with you.
And for everyone else...
Come see what all the fuss is about! It's sexy! It's controversial!
http://www.archive.org/movies/details-db.php?id=5395
|
Poster:
|
Lewis Payne |
Date:
|
April 28, 2004 02:50:38pm |
|
Forum:
|
prelinger
|
Subject:
|
Re: 3 rules for decency to enhance the archive,s prestige |
Lol! Obvious parody (where the heck did McLibel come into it?). Absolute genius. I'd love to see jack2's review for the original Perversion for Profit. ;)
|
Poster:
|
summerseve |
Date:
|
April 28, 2004 11:30:55pm |
|
Forum:
|
prelinger
|
Subject:
|
Re: 3 rules for decency to enhance the archive,s prestige |
Hey Lewis,
Re: your "obvious parody" comment-- you're referring to certain forum postings, right? If that is the case, then yeah...absolute friggin' genius. Talk about being committed to a character! Olivier would be proud. Or maybe Andy Kaufman...
|
Poster:
|
Lewis Payne |
Date:
|
April 29, 2004 01:08:59pm |
|
Forum:
|
prelinger
|
Subject:
|
Re: 3 rules for decency to enhance the archive,s prestige |
Haha, well not quite... I was referring to the video in question. jack2 made vague rumblings about libel and slander, which clearly do not in any way apply to something that is as obvious a parody as that video. :)
TVNews
OpenLibrary